Skip to main content
CEOPayWatch
Metrics

Pay vs. Performance Disclosure

An SEC-mandated table and graph in the proxy statement showing the relationship between executive compensation actually paid and company financial performance.

Pay vs. Performance Disclosure is a term from U.S. executive-compensation disclosure — typically a line item in the SEC Summary Compensation Table, a concept in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of the proxy statement, or a category from the say-on-pay regulatory framework. Understanding Pay vs. Performance Disclosure is part of reading public-company executive pay defensibly. SEC compensation disclosure rules have evolved meaningfully over the past two decades, and several concepts in current proxy statements (pay-versus-performance disclosure, CEO pay ratio, hedging policies) have different conventions than older disclosures.

Each company page on CEOPay surfaces the Pay vs. Performance Disclosure-relevant disclosure for that specific filing, so the general definition here translates into concrete pay-data context on the per-company pages.

In Depth

The pay-versus-performance (PvP) disclosure is a relatively new proxy statement requirement, finalized by the SEC in August 2022 under Section 953(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act. Companies first included this disclosure in proxy statements filed in 2023 for fiscal year 2022. The PvP table requires companies to report "compensation actually paid" (CAP), a measure that adjusts the Summary Compensation Table total to reflect the actual value of equity awards based on year-end stock prices and vesting events, rather than grant-date fair values. This provides a more accurate picture of what executives actually received in economic value. The table must show CAP alongside total shareholder return (including a peer group comparison), net income, and one company-selected financial measure that the registrant considers the most important metric used to link pay to performance in the most recent fiscal year. Companies must also provide a narrative or graphical description of the relationships between these metrics and CAP. The PvP disclosure has been praised by governance advocates for making it easier to identify companies where high pay is accompanied by poor stock performance, a red flag for misalignment. However, critics note that the CAP calculation is complex, can produce volatile year-over-year swings driven by stock price movements rather than pay decisions, and may be difficult for average shareholders to interpret. CEOPayWatch incorporates PvP data into our analysis to help users understand whether CEO compensation tracks with the value actually created for shareholders.

Related Terms

Explore More

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Pay vs. Performance Disclosure?

An SEC-mandated table and graph in the proxy statement showing the relationship between executive compensation actually paid and company financial performance.

Why does Pay vs. Performance Disclosure matter for shareholders?

Understanding Pay vs. Performance Disclosure is essential for evaluating executive compensation and corporate governance. It directly affects how shareholders assess whether CEO pay is justified and aligned with company performance. Informed shareholders use this concept when voting on say-on-pay proposals and evaluating board accountability.

Source: SEC EDGAR DEF 14A proxy statements, 2026.