Skip to main content
CEOPay
Equity Awards

Performance Share Units (PSUs)

Equity awards that vest only if specified performance targets — such as TSR, EPS, or revenue growth — are achieved.

In Depth

Performance share units are equity awards contingent on the company meeting predetermined financial or operational targets over a multi-year measurement period, typically three years. Common performance metrics include total shareholder return relative to a peer group, earnings per share growth, return on invested capital, revenue growth, and free cash flow targets. At the end of the performance period, the number of shares that vest can range from 0% (if threshold performance is not met) to 200% or more of the target grant (if maximum performance is achieved). This leverage means PSUs can be worth significantly more — or less — than their original grant-date value. PSUs have become the preferred vehicle for aligning executive pay with company performance. According to proxy advisory firms like ISS and Glass Lewis, a majority of S&P 500 companies now use PSUs as a significant component of their long-term incentive programs. The use of relative total shareholder return (rTSR) as a performance metric is particularly common because it directly measures value creation for shareholders compared to peers. However, designing effective PSU programs requires careful selection of metrics, peer groups, and payout curves. Poorly designed programs can reward mediocre performance or fail to differentiate between good and poor management. Compensation committees typically disclose the specific metrics, targets, and payout formulas in the proxy statement's CD&A section.

Related Terms

Explore More

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Performance Share Units?

Equity awards that vest only if specified performance targets — such as TSR, EPS, or revenue growth — are achieved.

Why does Performance Share Units matter for shareholders?

Understanding Performance Share Units is essential for evaluating executive compensation and corporate governance. It directly affects how shareholders assess whether CEO pay is justified and aligned with company performance. Informed shareholders use this concept when voting on say-on-pay proposals and evaluating board accountability.