Applied Materials vs Lam Research — CEO Pay Comparison
Gary Dickerson (Applied Materials) earns $0 more in total compensation than Tim Archer (Lam Research).
| Metric | Applied MaterialsAMAT | Lam ResearchLRCX |
|---|---|---|
| CEO | Gary Dickerson | Tim Archer |
| Industry | Semiconductor Equipment | Semiconductor Equipment |
| Total Compensation | $12.0M | $12.0M |
| Base Salary | $1.2M | $1.2M |
| Stock Awards | $6.0M | $6.0M |
| Option Awards | $1.4M | $1.4M |
| Non-Equity Incentive | $1.8M | $1.8M |
| Pay-for-Performance Grade | C (61/100) | A (98/100) |
| CEO-Worker Pay Ratio | 92:1 | 92:1 |
| Median Worker Pay | $130K | $130K |
| Say-on-Pay Approval | 95.5% | 90.5% |
| 3yr Total Shareholder Return | -9.9% | +101.5% |
| Revenue | $27.2B | $17.4B |
| Market Cap | $170.0B | $110.0B |
| Employees | 35,300 | 17,000 |
Analysis
Gary Dickerson (Applied Materials) earns $12.0M in total compensation, while Tim Archer (Lam Research) earns $12.0M.
On pay-for-performance alignment, Applied Materials scores C (61/100) while Lam Research scores A (98/100). Lam Research's CEO compensation is better aligned with company performance.
Applied Materials's CEO-to-worker pay ratio is 92:1 compared to Lam Research's 92:1. Shareholders approved CEO pay at 95.5% (Applied Materials) and 90.5% (Lam Research).