Skip to main content
CEOPayWatch

Updated April 2026 · SEC DEF 14A data

Arthur J Gallagher vs Marsh & McLennan, CEO Pay Comparison

John Doyle, Marsh & McLennan's CEO, earns $4.0M more in reported total compensation than Patrick Gallagher at Arthur J Gallagher, based on the most recent SEC DEF 14A proxy filings. Arthur J Gallagher earns a Pay-for-Performance Grade of B; Marsh & McLennan earns a C.

Patrick Gallagher at Arthur J Gallagher ($8.0M) and John Doyle at Marsh & McLennan ($12.0M) are close on total compensation. With pay close, the more interesting comparison is on performance: TSR ran 7.7% versus -6.2% over the three-year window.

CEO compensation comparisons require peer-group context. Compensation committees explicitly select peer groups for setting CEO pay; two companies may use different peer groups even when they appear in similar industries. The full per-company pages surface the disclosed peer-group context.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricArthur J GallagherAJGMarsh & McLennanMMC
CEOPatrick GallagherJohn Doyle
IndustryInsurance BrokersInsurance Brokers
Total Compensation$8.0M$12.0M
Base Salary$800K$1.2M
Stock Awards$4.0M$6.0M
Option Awards$960K$1.4M
Non-Equity Incentive$1.2M$1.8M
Pay-for-Performance GradeB (70/100)C (54/100)
CEO-Worker Pay Ratio107:1160:1
Median Worker Pay$75K$75K
Say-on-Pay Approval91.5%85.7%
3yr Total Shareholder Return+7.7%-6.2%
Revenue$11.4B$23.9B
Market Cap$65.0B$110.0B
Employees53,00085,000

Reading the Comparison

John Doyle (Marsh & McLennan) earns $4.0M more than Patrick Gallagher (Arthur J Gallagher) — a meaningful gap reflecting both pay-package design and the size of the most recent equity grant under FASB ASC 718 grant-date fair value accounting.

On Pay-for-Performance Grade, Arthur J Gallagher edges Marsh & McLennan 70/100 (B) to 54/100 (C). The 16-point gap usually reflects one or two factors moving in opposite directions — typically say-on-pay vote share or relative TSR.

CEO-to-worker pay ratios diverge meaningfully: 160:1 at Marsh & McLennan versus 107:1 at Arthur J Gallagher. The gap usually reflects workforce composition — Marsh & McLennan likely has a larger share of part-time or hourly employees pushing down median worker pay under the SEC Item 402(u) calculation. Arthur J Gallagher's pay package received 91.5% shareholder approval, ahead of Marsh & McLennan's 85.7%. Both votes are above the 70% scrutiny threshold but the 5.8-point gap indicates somewhat different shareholder views on pay structure.

How These Numbers Are Sourced

Every metric in the comparison table comes from a primary public source. Total compensation, salary, stock awards, option awards, and non-equity incentive figures come from the Summary Compensation Table of each company's most recent DEF 14A — the table the SEC requires every U.S. public company to file annually under Regulation S-K Item 402. CEO-to-worker pay ratio comes from the Item 402(u) disclosure required since 2018. Say-on-pay vote share comes from the 8-K filed within four business days of each annual meeting. 3-year total shareholder return is computed from split-adjusted, dividend-reinvested price data over the most recent 36 months.

The Pay-for-Performance Grade is the four-factor composite documented at methodology: relative TSR (35%), revenue versus compensation growth (25%), say-on-pay vote (25%), and pay ratio versus peers (15%). Authoritative governance frameworks come from Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) and Glass Lewis. Underlying SEC filings for both Arthur J Gallagher and Marsh & McLennan are available on the EDGAR system.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much do the CEOs of Arthur J Gallagher and Marsh & McLennan earn?

Patrick Gallagher, CEO of Arthur J Gallagher, earned $8.0M in reported total compensation in the most recently disclosed fiscal year. John Doyle at Marsh & McLennan earned $12.0M. Both figures come from the Summary Compensation Table inside each company's most recent DEF 14A proxy statement.

Which company has better Pay-for-Performance alignment?

On Pay-for-Performance Grade, Arthur J Gallagher edges Marsh & McLennan 70/100 (B) to 54/100 (C). The 16-point gap usually reflects one or two factors moving in opposite directions — typically say-on-pay vote share or relative TSR. The grade is computed from a four-factor composite: 3-year relative TSR (35%), revenue versus compensation growth (25%), say-on-pay vote (25%), and CEO-to-worker pay ratio versus peers (15%).

How do CEO-to-worker pay ratios compare?

Arthur J Gallagher reports a CEO-to-median-worker pay ratio of 107:1 on its most recent Item 402(u) disclosure; Marsh & McLennan reports 160:1. CEO-to-worker pay ratios diverge meaningfully: 160:1 at Marsh & McLennan versus 107:1 at Arthur J Gallagher. The gap usually reflects workforce composition — Marsh & McLennan likely has a larger share of part-time or hourly employees pushing down median worker pay under the SEC Item 402(u) calculation.

Did shareholders approve each pay package?

Arthur J Gallagher's pay package received 91.5% shareholder approval, ahead of Marsh & McLennan's 85.7%. Both votes are above the 70% scrutiny threshold but the 5.8-point gap indicates somewhat different shareholder views on pay structure. Say-on-pay is an advisory vote required by Section 951 of the Dodd-Frank Act and conducted at each annual shareholder meeting.

Where does this comparison data come from?

Every figure on this page is sourced from public SEC filings: the DEF 14A proxy statement for compensation under Regulation S-K Item 402, the same proxy's Item 402(u) disclosure for pay ratio, the 8-K filed within four business days of each annual meeting for say-on-pay vote share, and the 10-K for revenue, market cap, and employee count. All filings are available on the SEC EDGAR system at https://www.sec.gov/edgar.shtml.

Source: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, DEF 14A and 8-K filings via EDGAR. Public domain.

Last updated 2026-04-06 · comparing Arthur J Gallagher (AJG) and Marsh & McLennan (MMC).