Colgate-Palmolive vs Procter & Gamble — CEO Pay Comparison
Jon Moeller (Procter & Gamble) earns $4.0M more in total compensation than Noel Wallace (Colgate-Palmolive).
| Metric | Colgate-PalmoliveCL | Procter & GamblePG |
|---|---|---|
| CEO | Noel Wallace | Jon Moeller |
| Industry | Consumer Products | Consumer Products |
| Total Compensation | $8.0M | $12.0M |
| Base Salary | $800K | $1.2M |
| Stock Awards | $4.0M | $6.0M |
| Option Awards | $960K | $1.4M |
| Non-Equity Incentive | $1.2M | $1.8M |
| Pay-for-Performance Grade | C (58/100) | C (60/100) |
| CEO-Worker Pay Ratio | 123:1 | 185:1 |
| Median Worker Pay | $65K | $65K |
| Say-on-Pay Approval | 94.2% | 93.6% |
| 3yr Total Shareholder Return | -12.2% | -2.4% |
| Revenue | $19.5B | $84.0B |
| Market Cap | $80.0B | $370.0B |
| Employees | 34,000 | 107,000 |
Analysis
Noel Wallace (Colgate-Palmolive) earns $8.0M in total compensation, while Jon Moeller (Procter & Gamble) earns $12.0M. That is a difference of $4.0M.
On pay-for-performance alignment, Colgate-Palmolive scores C (58/100) while Procter & Gamble scores C (60/100). Procter & Gamble's CEO compensation is better aligned with company performance.
Colgate-Palmolive's CEO-to-worker pay ratio is 123:1 compared to Procter & Gamble's 185:1. Shareholders approved CEO pay at 94.2% (Colgate-Palmolive) and 93.6% (Procter & Gamble).