Ford Motor vs General Motors — CEO Pay Comparison
Jim Farley (Ford Motor) earns $2.2M more in total compensation than Mary Barra (General Motors).
| Metric | Ford MotorF | General MotorsGM |
|---|---|---|
| CEO | Jim Farley | Mary Barra |
| Industry | Automobiles | Automobiles |
| Total Compensation | $10.2M | $8.0M |
| Base Salary | $1.0M | $800K |
| Stock Awards | $5.1M | $4.0M |
| Option Awards | $1.2M | $960K |
| Non-Equity Incentive | $1.5M | $1.2M |
| Pay-for-Performance Grade | C (54/100) | B (74/100) |
| CEO-Worker Pay Ratio | 157:1 | 123:1 |
| Median Worker Pay | $65K | $65K |
| Say-on-Pay Approval | 91.5% | 94.7% |
| 3yr Total Shareholder Return | +11.8% | +14.2% |
| Revenue | $176.2B | $172.0B |
| Market Cap | $45.0B | $55.0B |
| Employees | 177,000 | 167,000 |
Analysis
Jim Farley (Ford Motor) earns $10.2M in total compensation, while Mary Barra (General Motors) earns $8.0M. That is a difference of $2.2M.
On pay-for-performance alignment, Ford Motor scores C (54/100) while General Motors scores B (74/100). General Motors's CEO compensation is better aligned with company performance.
Ford Motor's CEO-to-worker pay ratio is 157:1 compared to General Motors's 123:1. Shareholders approved CEO pay at 91.5% (Ford Motor) and 94.7% (General Motors).