Boeing vs Lockheed Martin — CEO Pay Comparison
Kelly Ortberg (Boeing) earns $0 more in total compensation than Jim Taiclet (Lockheed Martin).
| Metric | BoeingBA | Lockheed MartinLMT |
|---|---|---|
| CEO | Kelly Ortberg | Jim Taiclet |
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense |
| Total Compensation | $12.0M | $12.0M |
| Base Salary | $1.2M | $1.2M |
| Stock Awards | $6.0M | $6.0M |
| Option Awards | $1.4M | $1.4M |
| Non-Equity Incentive | $1.8M | $1.8M |
| Pay-for-Performance Grade | B (75/100) | B (69/100) |
| CEO-Worker Pay Ratio | 120:1 | 120:1 |
| Median Worker Pay | $100K | $100K |
| Say-on-Pay Approval | 91.8% | 92.8% |
| 3yr Total Shareholder Return | +20.5% | +5.7% |
| Revenue | $77.8B | $67.6B |
| Market Cap | $130.0B | $130.0B |
| Employees | 170,000 | 122,000 |
Analysis
Kelly Ortberg (Boeing) earns $12.0M in total compensation, while Jim Taiclet (Lockheed Martin) earns $12.0M.
On pay-for-performance alignment, Boeing scores B (75/100) while Lockheed Martin scores B (69/100). Boeing's CEO compensation is better aligned with company performance.
Boeing's CEO-to-worker pay ratio is 120:1 compared to Lockheed Martin's 120:1. Shareholders approved CEO pay at 91.8% (Boeing) and 92.8% (Lockheed Martin).