Church & Dwight vs Procter & Gamble — CEO Pay Comparison
Jon Moeller (Procter & Gamble) earns $4.0M more in total compensation than Matthew Farrell (Church & Dwight).
| Metric | Church & DwightCHD | Procter & GamblePG |
|---|---|---|
| CEO | Matthew Farrell | Jon Moeller |
| Industry | Consumer Products | Consumer Products |
| Total Compensation | $8.0M | $12.0M |
| Base Salary | $800K | $1.2M |
| Stock Awards | $4.0M | $6.0M |
| Option Awards | $960K | $1.4M |
| Non-Equity Incentive | $1.2M | $1.8M |
| Pay-for-Performance Grade | B (70/100) | C (60/100) |
| CEO-Worker Pay Ratio | 123:1 | 185:1 |
| Median Worker Pay | $65K | $65K |
| Say-on-Pay Approval | 95.5% | 93.6% |
| 3yr Total Shareholder Return | +11.6% | -2.4% |
| Revenue | $6.1B | $84.0B |
| Market Cap | $25.0B | $370.0B |
| Employees | 5,600 | 107,000 |
Analysis
Matthew Farrell (Church & Dwight) earns $8.0M in total compensation, while Jon Moeller (Procter & Gamble) earns $12.0M. That is a difference of $4.0M.
On pay-for-performance alignment, Church & Dwight scores B (70/100) while Procter & Gamble scores C (60/100). Church & Dwight's CEO compensation is better aligned with company performance.
Church & Dwight's CEO-to-worker pay ratio is 123:1 compared to Procter & Gamble's 185:1. Shareholders approved CEO pay at 95.5% (Church & Dwight) and 93.6% (Procter & Gamble).