Coca-Cola vs Monster Beverage — CEO Pay Comparison
James Quincey (Coca-Cola) earns $4.0M more in total compensation than Hilton Schlosberg (Monster Beverage).
| Metric | Coca-ColaKO | Monster BeverageMNST |
|---|---|---|
| CEO | James Quincey | Hilton Schlosberg |
| Industry | Beverages | Beverages |
| Total Compensation | $12.0M | $8.0M |
| Base Salary | $1.2M | $800K |
| Stock Awards | $6.0M | $4.0M |
| Option Awards | $1.4M | $960K |
| Non-Equity Incentive | $1.8M | $1.2M |
| Pay-for-Performance Grade | C (56/100) | B (75/100) |
| CEO-Worker Pay Ratio | 200:1 | 133:1 |
| Median Worker Pay | $60K | $60K |
| Say-on-Pay Approval | 88.6% | 93.6% |
| 3yr Total Shareholder Return | -5.8% | +20.1% |
| Revenue | $46.5B | $7.1B |
| Market Cap | $270.0B | $50.0B |
| Employees | 79,000 | 5,700 |
Analysis
James Quincey (Coca-Cola) earns $12.0M in total compensation, while Hilton Schlosberg (Monster Beverage) earns $8.0M. That is a difference of $4.0M.
On pay-for-performance alignment, Coca-Cola scores C (56/100) while Monster Beverage scores B (75/100). Monster Beverage's CEO compensation is better aligned with company performance.
Coca-Cola's CEO-to-worker pay ratio is 200:1 compared to Monster Beverage's 133:1. Shareholders approved CEO pay at 88.6% (Coca-Cola) and 93.6% (Monster Beverage).