ConocoPhillips vs EOG Resources — CEO Pay Comparison
Ryan Lance (ConocoPhillips) earns $4.0M more in total compensation than Ezra Yacob (EOG Resources).
| Metric | ConocoPhillipsCOP | EOG ResourcesEOG |
|---|---|---|
| CEO | Ryan Lance | Ezra Yacob |
| Industry | Oil & Gas | Oil & Gas |
| Total Compensation | $12.0M | $8.0M |
| Base Salary | $1.2M | $800K |
| Stock Awards | $6.0M | $4.0M |
| Option Awards | $1.4M | $960K |
| Non-Equity Incentive | $1.8M | $1.2M |
| Pay-for-Performance Grade | B (66/100) | C (59/100) |
| CEO-Worker Pay Ratio | 100:1 | 67:1 |
| Median Worker Pay | $120K | $120K |
| Say-on-Pay Approval | 90.1% | 94.3% |
| 3yr Total Shareholder Return | +4.0% | -8.7% |
| Revenue | $56.0B | $23.2B |
| Market Cap | $130.0B | $70.0B |
| Employees | 10,100 | 2,850 |
Analysis
Ryan Lance (ConocoPhillips) earns $12.0M in total compensation, while Ezra Yacob (EOG Resources) earns $8.0M. That is a difference of $4.0M.
On pay-for-performance alignment, ConocoPhillips scores B (66/100) while EOG Resources scores C (59/100). ConocoPhillips's CEO compensation is better aligned with company performance.
ConocoPhillips's CEO-to-worker pay ratio is 100:1 compared to EOG Resources's 67:1. Shareholders approved CEO pay at 90.1% (ConocoPhillips) and 94.3% (EOG Resources).