CrowdStrike vs Palo Alto Networks — CEO Pay Comparison
George Kurtz (CrowdStrike) earns $9.9M more in total compensation than Nikesh Arora (Palo Alto Networks).
| Metric | CrowdStrikeCRWD | Palo Alto NetworksPANW |
|---|---|---|
| CEO | George Kurtz | Nikesh Arora |
| Industry | Cybersecurity | Cybersecurity |
| Total Compensation | $21.9M | $12.0M |
| Base Salary | $2.2M | $1.2M |
| Stock Awards | $11.0M | $6.0M |
| Option Awards | $2.6M | $1.4M |
| Non-Equity Incentive | $3.3M | $1.8M |
| Pay-for-Performance Grade | C (60/100) | A (97/100) |
| CEO-Worker Pay Ratio | 146:1 | 80:1 |
| Median Worker Pay | $150K | $150K |
| Say-on-Pay Approval | 92.5% | 87.2% |
| 3yr Total Shareholder Return | +34.8% | +51.6% |
| Revenue | $4.0B | $8.0B |
| Market Cap | $75.0B | $120.0B |
| Employees | 9,573 | 15,800 |
Analysis
George Kurtz (CrowdStrike) earns $21.9M in total compensation, while Nikesh Arora (Palo Alto Networks) earns $12.0M. That is a difference of $9.9M.
On pay-for-performance alignment, CrowdStrike scores C (60/100) while Palo Alto Networks scores A (97/100). Palo Alto Networks's CEO compensation is better aligned with company performance.
CrowdStrike's CEO-to-worker pay ratio is 146:1 compared to Palo Alto Networks's 80:1. Shareholders approved CEO pay at 92.5% (CrowdStrike) and 87.2% (Palo Alto Networks).