Skip to main content
CEOPayWatch

Updated April 2026 · SEC DEF 14A data

Emerson Electric vs Rockwell Automation, CEO Pay Comparison

Lal Karsanbhai, Emerson Electric's CEO, earns $0 more in reported total compensation than Blake Moret at Rockwell Automation, based on the most recent SEC DEF 14A proxy filings. Emerson Electric earns a Pay-for-Performance Grade of B; Rockwell Automation earns a B.

Lal Karsanbhai at Emerson Electric ($8.0M) and Blake Moret at Rockwell Automation ($8.0M) are close on total compensation. With pay close, the more interesting comparison is on performance: TSR ran 7.0% versus 13.5% over the three-year window.

CEO compensation comparisons require peer-group context. Compensation committees explicitly select peer groups for setting CEO pay; two companies may use different peer groups even when they appear in similar industries. The full per-company pages surface the disclosed peer-group context.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricEmerson ElectricEMRRockwell AutomationROK
CEOLal KarsanbhaiBlake Moret
IndustryIndustrial AutomationIndustrial Automation
Total Compensation$8.0M$8.0M
Base Salary$800K$800K
Stock Awards$4.0M$4.0M
Option Awards$960K$960K
Non-Equity Incentive$1.2M$1.2M
Pay-for-Performance GradeB (72/100)B (74/100)
CEO-Worker Pay Ratio107:1107:1
Median Worker Pay$75K$75K
Say-on-Pay Approval96.4%94.3%
3yr Total Shareholder Return+7.0%+13.5%
Revenue$15.2B$8.3B
Market Cap$65.0B$30.0B
Employees67,00028,000

Reading the Comparison

Lal Karsanbhai (Emerson Electric) and Blake Moret (Rockwell Automation) earn nearly identical reported total compensation — $8.0M versus $8.0M — placing the two CEOs within $0 of each other on their most recent DEF 14A filings.

On Pay-for-Performance Grade, the two companies are roughly tied: Emerson Electric scores 72/100 (B) and Rockwell Automation scores 74/100 (B). Neither is clearly better aligned, the comparison turns on individual factors rather than the composite score.

CEO-to-worker pay ratios are similar: 107:1 at Emerson Electric versus 107:1 at Rockwell Automation. Both companies have median worker pay structures that produce comparable Item 402(u) ratios. Shareholders treated the two pay packages similarly in the most recent annual meetings: 96.4% support at Emerson Electric, 94.3% at Rockwell Automation. Both fall within the typical S&P 500 range.

How These Numbers Are Sourced

Every metric in the comparison table comes from a primary public source. Total compensation, salary, stock awards, option awards, and non-equity incentive figures come from the Summary Compensation Table of each company's most recent DEF 14A — the table the SEC requires every U.S. public company to file annually under Regulation S-K Item 402. CEO-to-worker pay ratio comes from the Item 402(u) disclosure required since 2018. Say-on-pay vote share comes from the 8-K filed within four business days of each annual meeting. 3-year total shareholder return is computed from split-adjusted, dividend-reinvested price data over the most recent 36 months.

The Pay-for-Performance Grade is the four-factor composite documented at methodology: relative TSR (35%), revenue versus compensation growth (25%), say-on-pay vote (25%), and pay ratio versus peers (15%). Authoritative governance frameworks come from Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) and Glass Lewis. Underlying SEC filings for both Emerson Electric and Rockwell Automation are available on the EDGAR system.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much do the CEOs of Emerson Electric and Rockwell Automation earn?

Lal Karsanbhai, CEO of Emerson Electric, earned $8.0M in reported total compensation in the most recently disclosed fiscal year. Blake Moret at Rockwell Automation earned $8.0M. Both figures come from the Summary Compensation Table inside each company's most recent DEF 14A proxy statement.

Which company has better Pay-for-Performance alignment?

On Pay-for-Performance Grade, the two companies are roughly tied: Emerson Electric scores 72/100 (B) and Rockwell Automation scores 74/100 (B). Neither is clearly better aligned, the comparison turns on individual factors rather than the composite score. The grade is computed from a four-factor composite: 3-year relative TSR (35%), revenue versus compensation growth (25%), say-on-pay vote (25%), and CEO-to-worker pay ratio versus peers (15%).

How do CEO-to-worker pay ratios compare?

Emerson Electric reports a CEO-to-median-worker pay ratio of 107:1 on its most recent Item 402(u) disclosure; Rockwell Automation reports 107:1. CEO-to-worker pay ratios are similar: 107:1 at Emerson Electric versus 107:1 at Rockwell Automation. Both companies have median worker pay structures that produce comparable Item 402(u) ratios.

Did shareholders approve each pay package?

Shareholders treated the two pay packages similarly in the most recent annual meetings: 96.4% support at Emerson Electric, 94.3% at Rockwell Automation. Both fall within the typical S&P 500 range. Say-on-pay is an advisory vote required by Section 951 of the Dodd-Frank Act and conducted at each annual shareholder meeting.

Where does this comparison data come from?

Every figure on this page is sourced from public SEC filings: the DEF 14A proxy statement for compensation under Regulation S-K Item 402, the same proxy's Item 402(u) disclosure for pay ratio, the 8-K filed within four business days of each annual meeting for say-on-pay vote share, and the 10-K for revenue, market cap, and employee count. All filings are available on the SEC EDGAR system at https://www.sec.gov/edgar.shtml.

Source: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, DEF 14A and 8-K filings via EDGAR. Public domain.

Last updated 2026-04-06 · comparing Emerson Electric (EMR) and Rockwell Automation (ROK).