Intel vs Marvell Technology — CEO Pay Comparison
Pat Gelsinger (Intel) earns $11.5M more in total compensation than Matt Murphy (Marvell Technology).
| Metric | IntelINTC | Marvell TechnologyMRVL |
|---|---|---|
| CEO | Pat Gelsinger | Matt Murphy |
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Total Compensation | $19.5M | $8.0M |
| Base Salary | $1.9M | $800K |
| Stock Awards | $9.7M | $4.0M |
| Option Awards | $2.3M | $960K |
| Non-Equity Incentive | $2.9M | $1.2M |
| Pay-for-Performance Grade | B (74/100) | C (54/100) |
| CEO-Worker Pay Ratio | 139:1 | 57:1 |
| Median Worker Pay | $140K | $140K |
| Say-on-Pay Approval | 88.7% | 89.0% |
| 3yr Total Shareholder Return | +3.8% | -12.7% |
| Revenue | $54.2B | $5.5B |
| Market Cap | $100.0B | $65.0B |
| Employees | 124,800 | 7,550 |
Analysis
Pat Gelsinger (Intel) earns $19.5M in total compensation, while Matt Murphy (Marvell Technology) earns $8.0M. That is a difference of $11.5M.
On pay-for-performance alignment, Intel scores B (74/100) while Marvell Technology scores C (54/100). Intel's CEO compensation is better aligned with company performance.
Intel's CEO-to-worker pay ratio is 139:1 compared to Marvell Technology's 57:1. Shareholders approved CEO pay at 88.7% (Intel) and 89.0% (Marvell Technology).