Skip to main content
CEOPayWatch

Is the Duke Energy CEO Overpaid?

On pay-for-performance, Duke Energy scores A (83/100) on the CEOPay rubric: Lynn Good earned $8.0M in 2010 while the company posted a 25.8% three-year total shareholder return — meaning pay is broadly aligned with shareholder returns. "Overpaid" is ultimately a judgment, but the grade puts the pay package next to the results it was meant to reward.

This page answers a common executive-compensation question: Is the Duke Energy CEO Overpaid?. The answer draws on SEC DEF 14A proxy statements, the public disclosure mechanism for U.S. public-company executive pay. Every public company must file an annual proxy statement disclosing CEO and named-executive-officer compensation in detail. Why this matters for shareholders: executive compensation is the single most-disclosed governance metric at U.S. public companies, and the Dodd-Frank-mandated say-on-pay vote gives shareholders an explicit channel to express approval or dissent. Reading pay data well — including pay-versus-performance, peer-group selection, and time-vesting structures — is a basic part of stock-by-stock fundamental analysis.

The detailed answer below uses the actual proxy-statement filings, explains how to read them, and translates the executive-compensation accounting into the shareholder-relevant interpretation.

Duke Energy Pay-for-Performance Scorecard

Pay-for-Performance grade
A (83/100)
3-yr shareholder return
25.8%
3-yr revenue growth
17.3%
Say-on-pay approval
88.1%
CEO total comp
$8.0M
CEO-to-worker ratio
84:1

Source: Duke Energy SEC DEF 14A proxy statement. Pay-for-Performance grade is CEOPay's proprietary score (TSR alignment 40%, revenue-vs-pay growth 30%, say-on-pay 20%, pay ratio vs peers 10%).

The CEOPay Pay-for-Performance Score grades Duke Energy a A (83/100). It weighs four factors pulled from the company's SEC filings: three-year total shareholder return alignment (76/100), revenue growth versus compensation growth (85/100), say-on-pay vote support (85/100), and CEO-to-worker pay ratio versus peers (100/100). Lynn Good's $8,000,000 package is the number those factors judge.

Over the trailing three years, Duke Energy delivered 25.8% total shareholder return on 17.3% revenue growth, and 88.1% of shareholders approved the pay plan in the most recent say-on-pay vote. Returns at that level make the package defensible on the numbers — the pay broadly tracked what shareholders earned.

There is no single threshold for "overpaid." The package only pays out in full if performance and vesting conditions are met, and equity dominates it: $4,000,000 of Lynn Good's 2010 pay came from stock awards versus $800,000 in base salary. Reasonable shareholders weigh the grade, the say-on-pay vote, and the peer-group context together rather than the headline number alone.

Pay & Performance Data

ComponentAmount
Total Compensation$8,000,000
Base Salary$800,000
Stock Awards$4,000,000
Option Awards$960,000
Non-Equity Incentive$1,200,000
CEO-to-Worker Pay Ratio84:1
Pay-Performance GradeA

Frequently Asked Questions

On pay-for-performance, Duke Energy scores A (83/100) on the CEOPay rubric: Lynn Good earned $8.0M in 2010 while the company posted a 25.8% three-year total shareholder return — meaning pay is broadly aligned with shareholder returns. "Overpaid" is ultimately a judgment, but the grade puts the pay package next to the results it was meant to reward.

Our Pay-for-Performance Score rates Duke Energy as A (83/100), based on three-year total shareholder return of 25.8%, revenue growth of 17.3%, and shareholder say-on-pay vote approval.

Lynn Good, CEO of Duke Energy, earned $8.0M in total compensation in 2010, including $4.0M in stock awards and $800,000 in base salary.

Duke Energy's CEO-to-worker pay ratio is 84:1. CEO Lynn Good earns approximately 84 times the median worker's pay of $95,000, as disclosed in the company's SEC DEF 14A proxy statement.

Lynn Good is the chief executive officer of Duke Energy (DUK).

On pay-for-performance, Duke Energy scores A (83/100) on the CEOPay rubric: Lynn Good earned $8.0M in 2010 while the company posted a 25.8% three-year total shareholder return — meaning pay is broadly aligned with shareholder returns. "Overpaid" is ultimately a judgment, but the grade puts the pay package next to the results it was meant to reward.

Source: SEC EDGAR DEF 14A proxy statements, 2026.