Skip to main content
CEOPayWatch

Is the Humana CEO Overpaid?

On pay-for-performance, Humana scores B (69/100) on the CEOPay rubric: Jim Rechtin earned $8.0M in 2025 while the company posted a 8.0% three-year total shareholder return — meaning pay is broadly aligned with shareholder returns. "Overpaid" is ultimately a judgment, but the grade puts the pay package next to the results it was meant to reward.

This page answers a common executive-compensation question: Is the Humana CEO Overpaid?. The answer draws on SEC DEF 14A proxy statements, the public disclosure mechanism for U.S. public-company executive pay. Every public company must file an annual proxy statement disclosing CEO and named-executive-officer compensation in detail. Why this matters for shareholders: executive compensation is the single most-disclosed governance metric at U.S. public companies, and the Dodd-Frank-mandated say-on-pay vote gives shareholders an explicit channel to express approval or dissent. Reading pay data well — including pay-versus-performance, peer-group selection, and time-vesting structures — is a basic part of stock-by-stock fundamental analysis.

The detailed answer below uses the actual proxy-statement filings, explains how to read them, and translates the executive-compensation accounting into the shareholder-relevant interpretation.

Humana Pay-for-Performance Scorecard

Pay-for-Performance grade
B (69/100)
3-yr shareholder return
8.0%
3-yr revenue growth
10.4%
Say-on-pay approval
86.0%
CEO total comp
$8.0M
CEO-to-worker ratio
133:1

Source: Humana SEC DEF 14A proxy statement. Pay-for-Performance grade is CEOPay's proprietary score (TSR alignment 40%, revenue-vs-pay growth 30%, say-on-pay 20%, pay ratio vs peers 10%).

The CEOPay Pay-for-Performance Score grades Humana a B (69/100). It weighs four factors pulled from the company's SEC filings: three-year total shareholder return alignment (58/100), revenue growth versus compensation growth (71/100), say-on-pay vote support (80/100), and CEO-to-worker pay ratio versus peers (83/100). Jim Rechtin's $8,000,000 package is the number those factors judge.

Over the trailing three years, Humana delivered 8.0% total shareholder return on 10.4% revenue growth, and 86.0% of shareholders approved the pay plan in the most recent say-on-pay vote. Returns at that level make the package defensible on the numbers — the pay broadly tracked what shareholders earned.

There is no single threshold for "overpaid." The package only pays out in full if performance and vesting conditions are met, and equity dominates it: $4,000,000 of Jim Rechtin's 2025 pay came from stock awards versus $800,000 in base salary. Reasonable shareholders weigh the grade, the say-on-pay vote, and the peer-group context together rather than the headline number alone.

Pay & Performance Data

ComponentAmount
Total Compensation$8,000,000
Base Salary$800,000
Stock Awards$4,000,000
Option Awards$960,000
Non-Equity Incentive$1,200,000
CEO-to-Worker Pay Ratio133:1
Pay-Performance GradeB

Frequently Asked Questions

On pay-for-performance, Humana scores B (69/100) on the CEOPay rubric: Jim Rechtin earned $8.0M in 2025 while the company posted a 8.0% three-year total shareholder return — meaning pay is broadly aligned with shareholder returns. "Overpaid" is ultimately a judgment, but the grade puts the pay package next to the results it was meant to reward.

Our Pay-for-Performance Score rates Humana as B (69/100), based on three-year total shareholder return of 8.0%, revenue growth of 10.4%, and shareholder say-on-pay vote approval.

Jim Rechtin, CEO of Humana, earned $8.0M in total compensation in 2025, including $4.0M in stock awards and $800,000 in base salary.

Humana's CEO-to-worker pay ratio is 133:1. CEO Jim Rechtin earns approximately 133 times the median worker's pay of $60,000, as disclosed in the company's SEC DEF 14A proxy statement.

Jim Rechtin is the chief executive officer of Humana (HUM).

On pay-for-performance, Humana scores B (69/100) on the CEOPay rubric: Jim Rechtin earned $8.0M in 2025 while the company posted a 8.0% three-year total shareholder return — meaning pay is broadly aligned with shareholder returns. "Overpaid" is ultimately a judgment, but the grade puts the pay package next to the results it was meant to reward.

Source: SEC EDGAR DEF 14A proxy statements, 2026.